Physics & Astronomy
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Penrose's Cyclic Cosmology
Monday, November 22, 2010
Interview with MIT Physics Professor Walter Lewin
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Grant Funding
Research funding: Making the cut
Kelle at AstroBetter remarks that this is very similar to the situation in NSF review panels. Some good things to think about when writing proposals, especially for those of us who haven't sat on panels yet.
In the upcoming week, I'll be submitting my first postdoc application (meeps!) and embarking on a fun research trip. Hopefully both will provide some good blog fodder!
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Liouville's Theorem in the galaxy?
Monday, October 25, 2010
What I do....
Thursday, October 21, 2010
x-shaped head

Tuesday, October 5, 2010
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010
Link
Friday, September 24, 2010
Proposal Time!

Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Strange Spiral Structure
This is the "astronomy picture of the day" on September 14th. Saturday, August 28, 2010
A New Solar System
Friday, August 20, 2010
Drive-By Posting!
An 18 Billion Mile Journey is Almost Complete!
Next July, the planet Neptune will make its way back to the point in its orbit where it was originally discovered by Johann Galle and his assistant (probably a grad student, ha!), located within one degree of the position predicted by Urbain Le Verrier. Cool!
Making Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle Less Uncertain
One question addressed by the uncertainty principle is whether it is possible to predict both the position and momentum (or other pairs of observables) of a subatomic particle. In its original formulation, the uncertainty principle implies that it is not. However, the paper shows that in the presence of quantum memory, a device capable of reliably storing quantum states, it is possible to predict both precisely. Intensive research efforts are currently focused on producing such a memory and there is hope that one will be available in the near future.
To illustrate the main ideas, the paper outlines an imaginary “uncertainty game” in which two people, Alice and Bob, begin by agreeing on two measurements, R and S, one of which will be performed. Bob then prepares a particle in a quantum state of his choosing. Without telling Alice what he has done, he sends the particle (over a channel) to Alice. Alice performs one of the two measurements (chosen at random) and tells Bob which observable she has measured, though not the measurement’s value. Bob wants to correctly guess the measurement value. If Bob had only a classical memory (e.g. a piece of paper), he would not be able to guess correctly all of the time — this is what Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation implies. However, if Bob is able to entangle the particle he sends with a quantum memory, for any measurement Alice makes on the particle, there is a measurement on Bob’s memory that always gives him the same outcome. His uncertainty has vanished.
The paper provides a new uncertainty relation valid in the presence of a quantum memory. More precisely, it proves a lower bound on the uncertainties of the measurement outcomes which depends on the amount of entanglement between the measured particle and the quantum memory. This had been conjectured by former PI researcher J.C. Boileau and J.M. Renes in 2008 (http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.3984) but was unproven until Colbeck et al’s work.
There are a number of potential applications arising from this work, notably for the burgeoning field of quantum cryptography. Although it was realized in the 1970s that the uncertainty principle could be used as the basis for ultra-secure communications, most quantum cryptographic approaches to date have not made use of it directly. The results may also yield a new method of ‘witnessing’ entanglement. Creating entangled states between particles (such as photons) is notoriously difficult, and once created, the states are easily destroyed by noise in the environment. A more straightforward witnessing method would be of great value to experimentalists striving to generate this precious resource, a necessary step towards developing quantum computers.
___________________
